Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Refactor CSS to support review drafts #200

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
May 29, 2018
Merged

Refactor CSS to support review drafts #200

merged 3 commits into from
May 29, 2018

Conversation

domenic
Copy link
Member

@domenic domenic commented May 9, 2018

Part of whatwg/sg#70.

The dfn.js change is a tagalong; I could split that out if people want.

To deploy this, we'd need to land this and speced/bikeshed#1239 at around the same time, then trigger Travis rebuilds of every spec.

domenic added 2 commits May 9, 2018 16:54
Now that almost everything is on Bikeshed, this distinction doesn't save anything.
It is no longer used; we instead use either Bikeshed's built-in definition feature, or a specific one for HTML found in https://github.com/whatwg/html/blob/master/html-dfn.js.
@domenic domenic requested a review from annevk May 9, 2018 21:19
domenic added a commit to domenic/bikeshed that referenced this pull request May 9, 2018
Assumes the filenames in whatwg/whatwg.org#200
domenic added a commit to domenic/bikeshed that referenced this pull request May 9, 2018
Assumes the filenames in whatwg/whatwg.org#200
Copy link
Member

@annevk annevk left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Putting review-draft.css and standard-common.css in fonts/ seems like a mistake, especially since you reference the latter as if it's in the root.

I guess the idea is that standard-common.css is always included, even for Review Drafts?

@domenic
Copy link
Member Author

domenic commented May 11, 2018

Oops, good catch, will fix and force push. And yeah, that's the idea. Any thoughts on a better name? Maybe "standard-or-review-draft.css"? :-/

@annevk
Copy link
Member

annevk commented May 11, 2018

Perhaps spec.css after the URL we use? (standard-common.css is fine too though.)

This will require corresponding changes to the WHATWG boilerplate used in Bikeshed.
@domenic
Copy link
Member Author

domenic commented May 11, 2018

Fixed

tabatkins pushed a commit to speced/bikeshed that referenced this pull request May 29, 2018
@domenic domenic merged commit 4c6f484 into master May 29, 2018
@domenic domenic deleted the css-refactor branch May 29, 2018 14:44
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants